PRSIndia
Published on PRSIndia (https://www.prsindia.org)

> Are there enough regulatory safeguards against nuclear power?

Are there enough regulatory safeguards against nuclear power? [1]

Simran's picture
Submitted by Simran on Tue, 10/30/2012 - 17:08
Are there enough regulatory safeguards against nuclear power?

The protests against the nuclear power plant at Kudankulam have intensified over the recent weeks [2].  The Kudankulam plant is expected to provide 2 GW of electricity [3] annually.  However, activists concerned about the risks of nuclear energy are demanding that the plant be shut down.  The safety of nuclear power plants is a technical matter.  In this blog post we discuss the present mechanism to regulate nuclear energy and the legislative proposals to amend this mechanism. Atomic materials and atomic energy are governed by the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.  The Act empowers the central government to produce, develop and use atomic energy.  At present, nuclear safety is regulated by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB).  Some of the drawbacks of the present mechanism are discussed below. Key issues under the present nuclear safety regulatory mechanism The AERB is not empowered to operate as an independent operator.  The AERB was established by the government through a notification [4] and not through an Act of Parliament.  Its powers and functions are therefore amendable by the Department of Atomic Energy through executive orders.  The parliamentary oversight exercised upon such executive action is lower than the parliamentary oversight over statutes. [1. The executive action or the Rules are in force from the date of their notification.  They are to be tabled before Parliament mandatorily.  However, an executive action is discussed and put to vote in Parliament only if an objection is raised by a Member of Parliament.  The executive orders may be reviewed by the committee on sub-ordinate legislation.  However, this committee has to oversee a large volume of rules and regulations.  For instance, there were 1264 statutory notifications that were tabled before the Rajya Sabha [5] in 2011-12.] Furthermore, the Atomic Energy Commission that sets out the atomic energy policy, and oversees the functioning of the AERB, is headed by the Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy.  This raises a conflict of interest, as the Department exercises administrative control over NPCIL that operates nuclear power plants. It is pertinent to note that various committee reports, including a CAG Report [6] in 2011, had highlighted the drawbacks in the present regulatory mechanisms and recommended the establishment of a statutory regulator.  A summary of the Report may be accessed here [6]. Proposed mechanism Following the Fukushima nuclear incident in 2011, the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill, 2011 was introduced in Parliament to replace the AERB. The Bill establishes the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority (NSRA) to regulate nuclear safety, and a Nuclear Safety Council to oversee nuclear safety policies that the NSRA issues.  Under the Bill, all activities related to nuclear power and nuclear materials may only be carried out under a licence issued by the NSRA. Extent of powers and independence of the NSRA The Bill establishes the NSRA as a statutory authority that is empowered to issue nuclear safety policies and regulations.  The Nuclear Safety Council established under the Bill to oversee these policies includes the Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy.  The conflict of interest that exists under the present mechanism may thus continue under the proposed regulatory system. The Bill provides that members of the NSRA can be removed by an order of the central government without a judicial inquiry.  This may affect the independence of the members of the NSRA.  This process is at variance with enactments that establish other regulatory authorities such as TRAI and the Competition Commission of India.  These enactments require a judicial inquiry prior to the removal of a member if it is alleged that he has acquired interest that is prejudicial to the functions of the authority. The proposed legislation also empowers the government to exclude strategic facilities from the ambit of the NSRA.  The government can decide whether these facilities should be brought under the jurisdiction of another regulatory authority. These and other issues arising from the Bill are discussed here [7].


 
Legislation [8]
Image: 
AERB [9],
Kudankulam [10],
NSRA [11],
nuclear power [12],
regulation of nuclear power [13],
safety of nuclear power plants [14]
  • What We Do
  • Board of Directors
  • Team
  • Opportunities at PRS
  • Disclaimer
Copyright © 2021 prsindia.org All Rights Reserved.
teen porn sikiş izle eskişehir escort bodrum escort bayan Eskişehir Escort Escort Eskişehir Kuzen Seks Hikayesi Amatör Porno Bodrum Escort olgun porno İzmit merkez escort mersin escort kocaeli escort eskişehir escort Stepmom licks sad teen in bedroom Женщина нежно лижет анус приятного мужика Girls equipped with big asses ready to get fucked hard Cute Sunny Redhead teeny taking fat cock Sexy teen vuole un hard martellante Super Hot Big Boobs MILF Has Hot Sex izmir escort baymavi giris escort bayan escort beylikduzu cratosslot hd xxx videos kocaeli escort Bakırköy Escort Bakırköy Masaj Taksim Spa izmir escort istanbul escort pendik escort Ataşehir Escort Seks Hikayesi Ataköy Escort Escort Ataköy Ataköy Bayan Escort Ataköy Bayan Ataköy Escort Hatun Escort Bayan Ataköy Yeni Escort Endüstriyel Mutfak Havalandirma escort denizli izmir escort bayan escort izmir escort izmir escort mersin altyazılı porno aydin escort hatay escort sivas escort sex stories kahramanmaraş escort beylikdüzü escort avcılar escort şirinevler escort esenyurt escort seks hikayesi elexbet vdcasino asyabahis giris escort izmir sekabet edirne escort seks hikayeleri Rug munch and fine sex Seks hikayesi sikiş hikayeleri Taksim Spa Escort Bayan instagram takipci satin al takipçi satın al

Source URL: https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/are-there-enough-regulatory-safeguards-against-nuclear-power

Links
[1] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/are-there-enough-regulatory-safeguards-against-nuclear-power
[2] http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Protest-erupts-in-Tamil-Nadu-over-Kudankulam-nuclear-power-plant/articleshow/17005357.cms
[3] http://www.npcil.nic.in/main/ConstructionDetail.aspx?ReactorID=77
[4] http://www.aerb.gov.in/cgi-bin/constitution/gazzette.asp
[5] http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/annual_report/2011/SubLegis.pdf
[6] http://saiindia.gov.in/english/home/Our_Products/Audit_Report/Government_Wise/union_audit/recent_reports/union_performance/2012_2013/SD/Report_9/ReportNo_9.html
[7] https://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Nuclear%20Safety/Legislative%20Brief%20NSRA%20Bill,%202011.pdf
[8] https://www.prsindia.org/blog-category/legislation
[9] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1430
[10] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1628
[11] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1629
[12] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1238
[13] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1630
[14] https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog?tag_term=1631