Home > Parliament related stuff > Are measures to minimize conflict of interest of MPs adequate?

Are measures to minimize conflict of interest of MPs adequate?

In India, one of the common threads that run through many of the corruption scandals is the issue of conflict of interest i.e. public officials taking policy decisions based on their personal interest.  For example, Shashi Tharoor in the IPL controversy or Ashok Chavan in the Adarsh Housing Society scam.

Many countries take measures to minimize conflict of interest of its MPs by regulating membership of parliamentarians in Committees, making it mandatory for them to declare pecuniary interest, and restricting employment both during and after completion of tenure.  For example, the US Senate has a detailed Code of Official Conduct that provides guidelines on conflict of interest.

India also has some measures in place to minimize conflict of interest.  These are codified in the Code of Conduct for Ministers, Code of Conduct for Members of the Rajya Sabha, Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and Handbook for Members of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.  Every Rajya Sabha MP has to declare his or her interest (along with assets and liabilities).  He has to declare five pecuniary interests:  remunerative directorship, remunerated activity, majority shareholding, paid consultancy and professional engagement.  Lok Sabha MPs can object to another MP joining a parliamentary committee on grounds that he has personal, pecuniary or direct interest.  (For more details, see PRS note on Conflict of Interest Issues in Parliament).

On December 1, 2010, PRS held its annual Conference on Effective Legislatures.  One of the topics discussed was MPs and Conflict of Interest: Issues and Resolution.  Panelists included D Raja, Prakash Javdekar and Supriya Sule.  Issues such as requirement for transparency, expertise of legislators, election of honest legislators, and ethical media were discussed.  The issues that were raised during the discussion are summarised in the PRS Summary of Proceedings from the Conference.

  1. vishal pratap singh
    December 21st, 2010 at 19:10 | #1

    D Raja ,Prakash Javedkar and supriya sule were the panelists on such an important issue…well.Moreover the summary of proceedings link is not working. no doubt PRS is doing an outstanding job of enlightening voters and making democracy more meaningful but however i was not happy with the panelists.keep up the good work and get good parliamentarians on the panel not those whose conflict of interest ironically has direct bearing on their stand about the issue.

  2. gautam jayasurya
    December 21st, 2010 at 19:36 | #2

    excellent write-up. short and crispy.

  1. No trackbacks yet.