Home > Uncategorized > What we have Learned about our MPs and Parliament

What we have Learned about our MPs and Parliament

This month, PRS Legislative Research is 5 years old! The objective when we started out was to make the legislative process in India better informed, more transparent and participatory.  From what started off as an idea, we believe we have made some progress towards our objective.

-       About 250 MPs across political parties have reached out to PRS for inputs on a range of issues that have come up in Parliament.  In addition, there are a number of MPs who use PRS material for their preparation in Parliament, even though they have not contacted PRS for further inputs.

-       PRS has increasingly become a resource for the media as well.  Over the past year, PRS has been cited on nearly 400 occasions by leading newspapers and websites as the source of information about legislation and Parliament.

These are some of the milestones that we feel happy to have reached.  But I want to really share are some of the learnings that we have had over these years.


The first thing that we have learned is that many of us carry so many wrong perceptions about our MPs. Most of us don’t know that more than 80 percent of our MPs have college degrees.  Most of us don’t know that the average attendance rate in Parliament is close to 80 percent in the past year.  Most of us don’t know that Parliament has worked for more than 90 percent of the scheduled time in recent sessions, despite the undesirable disruptions in Parliament. There is a lot that is wrong with our politics, but we hope that some of these facts throw light about some lesser known aspects about our MPs.

Laws are made for the really long term! That seems obvious, when we see examples such as our Indian Penal Code which was made in 1860, and the Land Acquisition Act that has haunted our country in recent years was passed in 1894.  And these are just some examples.  The fact is that if we do not debate our laws when they are being made, and citizens do not engage and provide inputs to this process, then we will be stuck with any issues that these laws might have for the next 100 years or more.  So it is critical to get the laws as close to ‘right’ as possible when they are being passed.

It is not obvious to most people that so many MPs put in significant effort to engage effectively in Parliament. Clearly, there is a selection bias, statistically speaking – I am talking of MPs who have reached out to us.  Despite this selection bias, the point is that there are a number of MPs who take their work in Parliament seriously, even though they know that much of the work they do in Parliament has almost no bearing on their re-election prospects.  (By the way, in most informal polls that I have done when I meet with groups of people, most do not know the role of an MP – even amongst some of the well educated groups.)

Why do so many MPs still work hard to prepare for their work in Parliament, despite knowing that this work has no bearing on their re-election prospects? On this, we can only hypothesize.  There are many MPs who understand their role as legislators and take it very seriously.  There are MPs who feel that making a good point on an issue on the floor of Parliament is a way to establish their grasp of a certain issue to their colleagues in Parliament, but also to the larger world.  For some others, it is a signalling device to their party colleagues about their interest and expertise in a certain subject area.  And we have had MPs who have said, that they feel very good when other MPs, especially from other parties, compliment them for making a good point.  All of these sound like good positive reasons for many MPs to want to be well prepared to speak in Parliament.

We have begun to appreciate that the role of the MP in Parliament is very challenging. I can point to at least three reasons, which are independent of how educated or capable an MP might be: (a) The range of subjects in Parliament is so wide that no individual, however intelligent, can be fully conversant with all the subjects being discussed.  (b) MPs have no research staff whatsoever, and are expected to do all of their preparatory work on their own, and (c) The constituency pressure on the MPs is often very high, making it difficult for them to pay adequate attention to their work in Parliament.

We most certainly want more from our MPs and our Parliament. We want our MPs to meet for more days, find better ways to raise issues in Parliament than to disrupt proceedings, debate in more detail the laws that they pass.  But what we have learned is that we cannot throw the baby out with the bath water.  So, I am not suggesting that we can’t do better or that our MPs or our Parliament are perfect.  The only way we will have a better Parliament is if we engage.  And more people engage – from all walks of life.  Policy making is not the exclusive preserve of either the expert or the policy maker.  The policy process can be greatly strengthened if we participate in the process and ensure that our MPs know that we want effective laws to govern us and our children.

Parliament can be made more effective by addressing some of the current bottlenecks. And some of these issues are not even difficult to fix.  For example, can we have more people in the committee staff to support the work of the standing committees in Parliament so they can cover more ground in any given year?  Can we have qualified research staff working for MPs so that they can go better prepared for Parliament?  (Our Legislative Assistants to MPs – LAMPs programme has shown that it is hugely rewarding for young legislative assistants and the MPs if such a platform is created.)  Can we have recorded voting on all legislative votes, instead of voice votes – the electronic button system is already in place to do this!  These are just some examples… and we at PRS have a laundry list of ideas for strengthening Parliament – with varying degrees of difficulty.  We have raised some of these issues in our Annual Conference of Effective Legislatures, and will continue to do so in the years ahead.

A very BIG thanks to each of you for making PRS possible over these past five years… We hope that you will continue to bless and support us in the years ahead to help shape a more robust policy making process in India.

PRS PRODUCTS

The Legislative Briefs are our flagship product.  Each Brief analyses one Bill pending in Parliament.  These are no longer than 6 pages and are sent to all MPs.  We then get calls from MPs asking for more information/ clarification.

Since earlier this year PRS has begun a Wednesday morning Policy Dialogue series exclusively for MPs.  These are widely attended by MPs across parties.

PRS is the knowledge partner to brief MPs in the Thursday morning Bill briefing sessions organised by the Constitution Club.

PRS has reached out to about 1000 journalists across the country, through journalist workshops and direct engagement.

PRS has started the Legislative Assistants to MPs (LAMPs) programme as a pilot initiative.  Under the programme, participating MPs get a trained legislative assistant for a period of three Parliament sessions.

PRS produces Primers to demystify Parliamentary process for citizens. These are widely used in our interactions with civil society groups.

The Vital Stats series is a crisp two page document that often highlights interesting aspects of Parliament.  They are very popular with journalists.

PRS has nearly 1000 fans on Facebook and 2000 followers on Twitter, including some MPs.

PRS has a Session Alert at the beginning of each session of Parliament.  On the last day of each session, PRS releases two reports on the just concluded session: Parliament Session Wrap and Plan vs. Performance.

PRS hosts an Annual Conference of Effective Legislatures each year to highlight certain aspects of the functioning of Parliament.

PRS has compiled a free online database of all state laws across the country.  This effort www.lawsofindia.org is the first effort of its kind in India.

The PRS website www.prsindia.org has become an important resource for anyone tracking the Indian Parliament both within the country and abroad.

Tags:
  1. Amruta Karambelkar
    October 11th, 2010 at 14:00 | #1

    Congratulations to team PRS fro successfully completing five years.

    It is commonplace to see public in general being highly negative vis-a-vis the political system. The system and its cogs are certainly responsible to a large extent for such political apathy amongst citizens. And that needs reform must leave no room for debate.

    However many times the good work done by the political representatives is seldom highlighted in the media.

    Although all of us had civics in school, none of us paid much attention to it and cared little to assimilate. Political apathy begins here.
    It is amazing to follow the propaganda during elections- National level election candidates promise good roads and water to a locality. This should concern local body and administration. But owing to political ignorance on the part of general public, such propaganda is left unquestioned. An average citizen,(unless a satkeholder) would understand little if a candidate talks of amendment or creation of certain law in an election rally. Thus political education and political socialisation is very limited.

    Whether it is good or bad, is a matter of debate. (Arguements by Milbrath)

    For effective governance and a successful democracy, popular political awareness is necessary. The system as well as civil society should create more avenues like the PRS to encourage greater political engagement.

  2. S Vijayaraghavan
    October 11th, 2010 at 21:17 | #2

    Excellent! Great to see that objective of PRS is being realised. Even greater to see that we have been able to identify MPs taking their jobs seriously. This part seldom appears in mainstream media.

    I wish that together we are able to disseminate all these precious informations to everyone in the country and make them realise that they have the power to collectively ensure good governance. And that to participate and opine they need this kind of a platform.

    Thanks and cheers
    S Vijayaraghavan

  3. Amar
    October 11th, 2010 at 22:49 | #3

    hi,this is amar student of LLM,constitutional law mysore university, i have been a regular visitor on your website ,the information here is many a time exclusive and to a extent exhaustive. Very impressive section on tracking of mp’s .i hope there would be more informative articles on rules of business and procedure, their interpretation for a better understanding of the legislative process…all the best on your great endeavor…,

  4. Parijat
    October 11th, 2010 at 23:16 | #4

    You have made a valid point that laws are made for the really long term. However, while that necessitates being careful when a law is written/enacted, there is a flip side to this too. Unlike a few centuries ago, society and social structures today change at an unimaginable pace. New businesses, new contractual structures, new social complications (say because of technology such as cloning or internet) develop at a rapid pace.

    Given this speed of change and given the slow pace of legislative processes, the nature of law itself has to evolve. It is no longer possible to give detailed provisions for every contingency. More of the nitty-gritty needs to be delegated to the executive while the legislature puts in place a broad architecture. If this is not done, we would continue to have laws where penalties as tiny (and economically infeasible to collect) as Rs. 25 will continue to exist pending legislative review. On the other hand, the danger of delegating too much to the executive cannot be forgotten. This is a difficult dilemma but one that needs to be clearly recognized and tackled.

  5. October 12th, 2010 at 12:23 | #5

    Many interesting and “not so much known” facts are presented in the blog. Although I would like to sympathize with the MPs for the “shortage” they face, but then we also need to know if they have so many problems, why can’t they “Ask” for the necessary support from the same parliament they serve. If they are serious enough in there “job” as Madhukar is suggesting, I think they should atleast ask for budgetary provision for having “Research Staff”, if they really think that this affects there performance in Parliament, then they should “stall” the proceedings of parliament till this demand is not met…. which in any case they always do for frivolous reasons. I dare to mention it here that many of these “MPs” are running Education institutions and colleges across the country….. funding interns/volunteers/researcher… is it such a big issue…. I doubt it.

  6. CV Madhukar
    October 15th, 2010 at 12:48 | #6

    @ Vijay@Vijay Pratap Singh Aditya
    Thanks for your comments. The question is not whether some MPs can fund research staff. As a matter of fact, some of them have hired research staff to help them. The question is an institutional one — do we want to depend on the wealth of MPs to decide who can afford to have research staff, or do we want to think about how to strengthen Parliament institutionally.

    On your other point — you are absolutely right. The MPs must ask for research staff more vociferously. If you actually see the debates this time on the salaries Bill, some of them did but perhaps not in a manner that is adequate to force the issue.

  7. kailash
    October 31st, 2010 at 11:36 | #7

    Great Work! Extremely useful site.

  1. July 1st, 2011 at 07:10 | #1