Home > Legislation Related, Parliament, States and State legislatures > Does the financing of “Rights” laws impinge on the rights of states

Does the financing of “Rights” laws impinge on the rights of states

In the last decade, some schemes have been recast as statutory entitlements – right to employment, right to education and right to food.  Whereas schemes were dependent on annual budgetary allocations, there rights are now justiciable, and it would be obligatory for Parliament to allocate sufficient resources in the budget.  Some of these rights also entail expenditure by state governments, with the implication that state legislatures will have to provide sufficient funds in their budgets.  Importantly, the amounts required are a significant proportion of the total budget.

There has been little debate on the core constitutional issue of whether any Parliament can pre-empt the role of resource allocation by future Parliaments.  Whereas a future Parliament can address this issue by amending the Act, such power is not available to state legislatures.  Through these Acts, Parliament is effectively constraining the spending preferences of states as expressed through their budgets passed by their respective legislative assemblies.  I have discussed these issues in my column in Pragati published on August 16, 2013.

  1. Nishad
    September 5th, 2013 at 11:01 | #1

    A different perspective. I really like your way of thinking.
    Your recent analysis of judicial appointment commission amendment bill was brilliant.
    Please Keep on posting!

  2. October 21st, 2014 at 04:28 | #2

    whoah this weblkog is excellent i really like studying
    your articles. Stay up the good work! You understand, lots of persons are looking around for this info,
    you could help them greatly.

  1. No trackbacks yet.