In India, children in the age group of 6-14 years have the
right to free and compulsory elementary education in a neighbourhood
school under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education
(RTE) Act, 2009. This covers primary (classes 1-5) and upper primary
(classes 6-8) levels, which collectively constitute elementary
Amongst several provisions focused on elementary
education, the Act provides for the No Detention Policy. Under this, no
child will be detained till the completion of elementary education in
class 8. The RTE (Second Amendment) Bill, 2017, introduced recently,
revisits the No Detention Policy. In light of this, we discuss the No
Detention Policy and issues affecting the implementation of RTE.
What is the No Detention Policy?
rationale for the No Detention Policy or automatic promotion to the
next class is minimising dropouts, making learning joyful, and removing
the fear of failure in exams.
The evaluation mechanism under the Policy is the Continuous and
Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) for holistic assessments (e.g.,
paper-pencil test, drawing and reading pictures, and expressing orally)
as opposed to the traditional system of examinations. CCE does not mean
no evaluation, but it means an evaluation of a different kind from the
traditional system of examinations.
What does the RTE (Second Amendment) Bill, 2017 propose to do?
The Bill proposes a ‘regular examination’ which will be held in class 5 and class 8 at the end of every academic year.
In the event that a child fails these examinations, he will be given
remedial instruction and the opportunity for a re-examination.
he fails in the re-examination, the central or state governments may
choose: (i) to not detain the child at all, or (ii) to detain the child
in class 5, class 8, or in both classes. This is in contrast to the
current Policy where a child cannot be detained until the completion of
Conversation around the No Detention Policy
the implementation of the No Detention Policy, experts have recommended
rolling it back partially or fully. The reasons for this
reconsideration include: (i) the lack of preparedness of the education
system to support the Policy, (ii) automatic promotion disincentivising
children from working hard, (iii) low accountability of teachers, (iv)
low learning outcomes, and (iii) the lack of proper implementation of
CCE and its integration with teacher training.1,,
2015, all the states were asked to share their views on the No
Detention Policy. Most of the states suggested modifications to the
Policy in its current form.
What do the numbers say?
to the enactment of RTE, enrolment has been 100% at the primary level
(see Figure 1). While enrolment has been universal (100%) at the
primary level, low transition of students from one class to another at
progressively higher levels has been noted. This has resulted in high
dropouts at the secondary education level, with the highest dropout rate
being 17% at the class 10 level (see Figure 2).
Figure 1: Enrolment in elementary education (2005-2014)
Sources: Education Statistics at a Glance, Ministry of Human Resource Development, 2016; PRS.
Enrolment over 100 % as seen in primary education signifies that
children below and above the age of six are being enrolled at the
primary education level.
One of the reasons for low
dropouts at the elementary level may be the obligation to automatically
promote and not detain children under the No Detention Policy. However,
there is no such obligation on the government to provide for the same
post class 9 i.e., in secondary education. The reasons which explain
the rise in dropouts at the secondary level include domestic activities
for girls and economic activities for boys, reasons common to both
include financial constraints and lack of interest in education.
Figure 2: Dropout rates in school education (2014-15)
Sources: Flash Statistics, District Information System for Education, 2015-16; PRS.
How does RTE ensure quality education?
on the high enrolment and low dropout rates in elementary education, it
can be inferred that children are being retained in schools for longer.
However, there have been some adverse observations regarding the
learning outcomes of such children. For example, the Economic Survey
2015-16 pointed out that only about 42% of students in class 5 (in
government schools) are able to read a class 2 text. This number has in
fact declined from 57% in 2007.
The National Achievement Survey (2015) for class 5 has also revealed
that performance of students, on an average, had gone down from the
previous round of the survey conducted in 2014.
Key reasons attributed to low learning levels are with regard to teacher training and high vacancies.7,,
Against a total of 19 lakh teacher positions sanctioned under Sarva
Shiksha Abhiyan in 2011-12, only 12 lakh were filled. Further,
approximately 4.5 lakh untrained teachers were operating in 19 states.
Teacher training institutes such as District Institutes of Education and
Training are also experiencing high vacancies with regard to trainers
who train teachers.
has also been noted that the presence of contract/temporary teachers,
instead of permanent teachers, contributes to the deterioration of
quality of education. In fact, experts have recommended that to ensure
quality secondary education, the reliance on contract/temporary teachers
must be done away with. Instead, fully qualified teachers with salary
and benefits must be hired.
It has also been recommended that teachers should not be burdened with
ancillary tasks of supervising cooking and serving of mid-day meals.10
RTE Act, 2009 sought to ensure that teachers acquire minimum
qualifications for their appointment, within five years of its enactment
(i.e. till March 31, 2015). Earlier this year, another Bill was
introduced in Parliament to amend this provision under the Act. The
Bill seeks to extend this deadline until 2019.
In sum, currently
there are two Bills seeking to amend the RTE Act, which are pending in
Parliament. It remains to be seen, how they impact the implementation
of the Act going forward.
“Report of CABE Sub Committee on Assessment on implementation of CCE
and no detention provision”, 2015, Ministry of Human Resource
 The RTE (Second Amendment) Bill, 2017.
 Change in No-Detention Policy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, March 9, 2017, Press Information Bureau.
 Unstarred question no. 1789, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Rajya Sabha, December 1, 2016.
 “Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Education”, NSS 71st Round, 2014, http://mail.mospi.gov.in/index.php/catalog/160/related_materials
 Economic Survey 2015-16, Ministry of Finance, http://indiabudget.nic.in/budget2016-2017/es2014-15/echapter-vol2.pdf
 National Achievement Survey, Class V (Cycle 3) Subject Wise Reports, 2014, http://www.ncert.nic.in/departments/nie/esd/pdf/NationalReport_subjectwise.pdf
“253rd Report: Demands for Grants 2013-14, Demand No. 57”, Department
of School Education and Literacy, Standing Committee on Human Resource
Development, April 26, 2013, http://126.96.36.199/newcommittee/reports/EnglishCommittees/Committee%20on%20HRD/253.pdf
“285th Report: Action Taken Report on 250th Report on Demands for
Grants 2016-17”, Department of School Education and Literacy, Standing
Committee on Human Resource Development, December 16, 2016, http://188.8.131.52/newcommittee/reports/EnglishCommittees/Committee%20on%20HRD/285.pdf
“283rd Report: The Implementation of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and
Mid-Day-Meal Scheme’, Department of School Education and Literacy,
Standing Committee on Human Resource Development, December 15, 2016, http://184.108.40.206/newcommittee/reports/EnglishCommittees/Committee%20on%20HRD/283.pdf
 “Report of the CABE Committee on Girls’ education and common school system”, Ministry of Human Resource Development, 2005, http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/document-reports/Girls%20Education.pdf